Our Father Who Art In Heaven Anglican Church Led By King Charles III Could

The debate is not new, because for years, in the UK and beyond, the question has been raised more and more intensely about whether or not there is a need for the theological expressions and corresponding rituals of the Christian churches to record a fundamental change: they would no longer whether to use the masculine gender when speaking of God, but to introduce a neutral reference and, consequently, with "much more modern and inclusive" language in all religious ceremonies with "non-gender" references The debate is evolving towards a final decision following the convening, within the Anglican Church, of two commissions which have the task of drawing up the final text of the decision which will have to be signed this spring by the Governor of this Church, its leader and defender who is king charles iii th.

Certainly, even if it seems picturesque-absurd, it could be the first serious decision that the new sovereign should take, perhaps immediately after the ceremony in which he will be crowned with Queen Camilla Despite what many people may think who say that the problems of the world we live in and which should be solved by the elders and sages of this world are entirely and entirely different, it is clear that there is a theme here that can be inflamed later in the good tradition of the major conflicts that marked the life of the Christian Churches in the past.

That is, in short, it can be left with a scandal not only there (because that concerns the British), but it can spread to other territories that, more or less effectively, still belong to the Commonwealth and where, far from the metropolis, faith in God still means something and the possible reading of a new prayer "on the new model" could even lead to bloodshed But is it really possible? Of course it can since Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury (the highest rank of prelate in the Anglican Church) said so convincingly and beautifully to his believers of all sexes, even multiple sexes: "God is not male or female.

God cannot be defined Since Antiquity, Christians have recognized the fact that God is neither male nor female, but the diversity of ways of addressing God and describing Him that we find in the Scriptures is not always reflected in our worship" Isolated and extreme case? Not at all because, officially, the Christian churches in Sweden and Norway already use a neutral reference when talking about God, the pronoun "iel".

And, in Sweden for example, the majority evangelical Church decided from 2077 to encourage its believers to use a revolutionary new formula: instead of "In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit", to say "In the name of God and of the Trinity" The current debate continues a deep current in favor of recognizing not only the rights of the LGBTQ+ community but also the increasingly important place it occupies in society.

Evidence is the pastoral guidelines published on December 11, 2018 by the Anglican Church in which special religious ceremonies intended for transgender people are recorded (read here the definition for Romania): "The Anglican Church welcomes and encourages the unconditional affirmation of transgender people, on an equal basis with all others, in the body of Christ and rejoices in the diversity of this body through which all Christians have been baptized by one Spirit " What will happen next? According to tradition, the Synod of Bishops of the Church of England will decide and present to king charles iii the text that he will have to sign.

He is not obliged to do it (at least in the memory of Henry VIII, the founder and spiritual leader of this Church) but that is how it happened in the modern period In this context, maybe - who knows if there are no miracles - in this debate we will hear, at least as a simple opinion, the common position, completely distinct, of the Christian churches in central and eastern Europe who (at least on this matter) agree with what the Russian Orthodox Church also supports, marking a real East/West civilizational and spiritual break.

You have here the very firm, extremely clear and tough position expressed by the BOR spokesperson I quote from the text: Current progressivism, the evil parent of gender ideology, is in turn a current of ancient Marxist-Leninist origin, a form of "intellectual terrorism" that abhors judeo-christianity fruitful of moral order, authority of any kind, hierarchies natural and which noisily privileges the marginal and the unnatural in favor of the center and the natural, strong values, validated by the millennial experience of mankind.

The (un)stated purpose? The destruction of the "old" world, the dissolution of the foundations of society built on faith, real culture, order, respect for the past and its moral & intellectual benchmarks, family, discipline, effort, honest emulation and axiological selection The classic meaning of the term "ideology", which appeared in parricidal and deicidal modernity around the French Revolution, indicates a silencing of reality emptied of any spiritual meaning, a placing of it on the Procustian bed of revolutionary hysterical group interest and an intoxication of the public sphere through the infusion into its space of essentially false ideas and themes, out of touch with the reality of "permanent things", with the history of universal culture and genuine science.

From this lucid perspective, gender ideology, like any other ideology secreted by morally and socially chaotic socialism, is situated at the opposite pole of truth That is, to that of the lie".

.